UNMASKING THE CHARISMATIC HERESY "For the time will come when people will not tolerate sound doctrine but, following their own desires and insatiable curiosity, will accumulate teachers and will stop listening to the truth and will be diverted to myths" 2 Timothy 4:3-4 - "False messiahs and false prophets will arise and will perform signs and wonders in order to mislead, if that were possible, the elect" Mark 13: 22 - "The smoke of Satan has entered the Church" Pope Paul VI

11.19.2006

BABEL TONGUES



Just about every false religion, cult and heretical group succumbs to tongues; to incoherent babbling in states of hyper-arousal and mental dissociation. Tongues can also be the mark of diabolical possession. This describes all of modern day tongue speaking.

The gift of tongues in Acts was different. In the New Testament "tongue" means "a language." The three examples of tongue speaking are found in Acts 2:5-11, Acts 10:44-46, and Acts 19:6. All New Testament tongues were ACTUAL LANGUAGES and understood by those who heard it. Clearly, the purpose of New Testament tongues was to COMMUNICATE the Gospel.

Modern day tongues are not actual languages; only a type of self-generated gibberish showing the signs of a psychologically induced phenomenon; based on the speaker’s linguistic background. Professor William J. Samarin of the University of Toronto's Department of Linguistics Research rejected the possibility that modern day tongues could be real languages. According to Samarin, glossolalia is mere "pseudo-language." His definition of glossolalia is "unintelligible babbling speech that exhibits superficial phonological similarity to language, without having consistent syntagmatic structure and that is not systematically derived from or related to known language." (William J. Samarin, "Variation and Variables in Religious Glossolalia," Language in Society, ed. Dell Haymes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1972 pgs. 121-130) From the thousands of tongues that have been tested by linguists, no actual languages were found.

Charismatics of course tell many tales about somebody somewhere recognizing some language at a prayer meeting, but the funny thing is… this always happens to someone else.

When tested, some tongues turn out to be blasphemies... So now there is a push in some charismatic circles to test them. But how do you test what nobody understands? Besides the human soul is an open vessel; it can hold God's grace in one minute and Satan in the next. What assurances can there be that the tongues that were found harmless will not deteriorate into blasphemies? And again, who would know the difference?

The proliferation of tongues in modern times is actually biblical; we find it in Genesis 11:9 as a punishment on Babel. Once again charismatic theology applies the reverse of “tongues” and promotes nonsensical jibber-jabber rather than the communication of the Gospel.

Blog Archive

About Me

My photo
Canada
I am a recovering charismatic and a Catholic Orthodox; observing orthopraxis to the best of my ability. I acknowledge what the Church REALLY DOES TEACH; opposed to what some people erroneously say the Church teaches. “Catholic Orthodoxy” is proposed "to conform to the Catholic faith as taught by the Magisterium of the Church. So an "orthodox" person is one who is FAITHFUL to the teachings of the Church, whereas a "heterodox" person is somebody who rejects ANY Catholic dogma. Orthopraxis means "Performing the correct actions". Catholic Orthodoxy is defined by the Catechism: it tells us what we have to TO BELIEVE. Catholic Orthopraxis is denoted by the Code of Canon Law: it spells out what we have TO DO. Because “Truth is not determined by a majority vote" -- Pope Benedict XVI.

Copyright

Fair Use Notice:

This web site may contain copyrighted material the use of which may not always have been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of political, human, religious, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

Tech

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?